Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Come Together..."R3" Media Response


Notes on "R3" Media:

"What is Crowdsourcing?"
    • Daily Crowdsource
    • Crowdsourcing is the process of getting work or funding, usually online, from a crowd of people. The word is a combination of the words 'crowd' and 'outsourcing'. The idea is to take work and outsource it to a crowd of workers.
    • Famous Example: Wikipedia. 
    • Crowdsourcing & Quality: The principle of crowdsourcing is that more heads are better than one. By canvassing a large crowd of people for ideas, skills, or participation, the quality of content and idea generation will be superior.
    • Different Types of Crowdsourcing:
      • Crowdsource Design
        • Tell a crowd of designers what you want, how much you will pay, and your deadline
        • All interested designers will create a finished design specifically for you. 
        • You can keep whichever design you like the best. 
        • Increases the quality
        • Decreases the price
        • Designs for furniture, fashion, advertisements, video, & product design. 
        • Just about anything that can be designed can be crowdsourced.
      • Crowdfunding
        • Asking a crowd of people to donate money to your project. 
        • You find a crowdfunding platform, set the goal amount, deadline, and any rewards offered to donors. 
        • You must raise 100% of your goal before the deadline, or all the donations are returned to the donors. 
        • I.e. Gofundme, kickstarter, etc.
        • Crowdfunding is mostly used by artists, charities, & start-ups to raise money for projects such as filming a documentary, manufacturing an iPod watch, cancer research, or seed money.
      • Microtasks
        • Breaking work up into tiny tasks and sending the work to a crowd of people. 
        • Break up the work and decide the payment for each completed task
        •  You can expect to see results within minutes. 
        • Microtasking can involve tasks such as scanning images, proofreading, database correction and transcribing audio files.
        • Work is done faster, cheaper, and usually with less errors
        • Additionally, microtasks can often be performed by people in less fortunate countries
      • Open Innovation
        • "Open innovation allows people from all aspects of business such as investors, designers, inventors, and marketers to collaborate into a functional profit making reality. 
        • This can be done either through a dedicated web platform to gain outside perspective, or used with only internal employees.
        • Open innovation brings together people from different parts of the world and different sectors of business to work together on a project. 
        • This is effectively a collection of different fields and levels of expertise that would not otherwise be available to any budding entrepreneur. 
        • It also elevates previously considered uninvolved parties, such as investors, to roll up their sleeves and impart their knowledge, essentially becoming more than just a cash cow."
    • Pros:
      • The ability to receive better quality results, since several people offer their best ideas, skills, & support. 
      • Crowdsourcing allows you to select the best result from a sea of ‘best entries,’ as opposed to receiving the best entry from a single provider. 
      • Results can be delivered much quicker than traditional methods, since crowdsourcing is a form of freelancing. 
      • You can get a finished video within a month, a finished design or idea within a week, and microtasks appear within minutes.
    • Cons: 
      • Clear instructions are essential in crowdsourcing. 
      • You could potentially be searching through thousands of possible ideas, which can be painstaking, or even complicated, if the instructions are not clearly understood. 
      • Some forms of crowdsourcing do involve spec work, which some people are against.
      • Quality can be difficult to judge if proper expectations are not clearly stated.
"Jimmy Wales: The Birth of Wikipedia"
    • TED
    • 1962, Charles Van Doren, (senior editor of Britannica) said the ideal encyclopedia should be radical -- it should stop being safe. 
    •  imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge.
    • funded by donations from the public
    • Costs very little to run Wikipedia 
    • Over 600,000 articles in English 
    • 2 million total articles across many different languages 
    • Truly global 
    • Yochai 
    • freely licensed encyclopedia
    • It's written by thousands of volunteers all over the world in many, many languages
    • It's written using Wiki software - so anyone can quickly edit and save, and it goes live on the Internet immediately. 
    • Wikipedia's owned by the Wikimedia Foundation
      • Nonprofit organization 
      • Founded by Jimmy Wales
      • Our goal: the core aim of the Wikimedia Foundation, is to get a free encyclopedia to every single person on the planet. 
      • It means a lot more than just building a cool website. 
      • We're really interested in all the issues of the digital divide, poverty worldwide, empowering people everywhere to have the information that they need to make good decisions.
      • A lot of work that goes beyond just the Internet
      • "And so that's a big part of why we've chosen the free licensing model
      • because that empowers local entrepreneurs -- or anyone who wants to, can take our content and do anything they like with it -- you can copy it, redistribute it and you can do it commercially or non-commercially"
    • All the editing is done by volunteers. 
    • And the way that we're organized is not like any traditional organization you can imagine.
    • "People are always asking, "Well, who's in charge of this?" or "Who does that?" And the answer is: anybody who wants to pitch in." 
    • It's a very unusual and chaotic thing. 
    • We've got over 90 servers now in three locations. 
    • These are managed by volunteer system administrators who are online. 
    • "You could never afford to have a standby crew of people 24 hours a day and do what we're doing at Wikipedia."
    • And everything is managed by the volunteers. 
    • And the total monthly cost for our bandwidth is about $5,000 (main cost)
    • Wikipedia Bush-Kerry controversy: 
      • The media has covered this somewhat extensively. 
      • It started out with an article in Red Herring. 
      • The articles were edited quite heavily. 
      • And it is true that we did have to lock the articles on a couple of occasions. 
      • Time magazine recently reported that "Extreme action sometimes has to be taken, and Wales locked the entries on Kerry and Bush for most of 2004." 
      • This came after I told the reporter that we had to lock it for -- occasionally a little bit here and there.
      • In summary, not really a controversy in reality 
    • Articles on controversial topics are edited a lot, but they don't cause much controversy within the community. 
    • The real struggle is not between the right and the left - that's where most people assume -but it's between the party of the thoughtful and the party of the jerks. 
    • Elements:
      • Mostly social policies  
      • Some elements of the software
      • Biggest and the most important thing: neutral point-of-view policy. 
        • A core principle of the community that's completely not debatable. 
        • It's a social concept of cooperation
      • The reason for this is if we say we're only going to write the "truth" about some topic, that doesn't do us a damn bit of good of figuring out what to write, because I don't agree with you about what's the truth. 
      • Neutrality: any time there's a controversial issue, Wikipedia itself should not take a stand on the issue. 
      • We should merely report on what reputable parties have said about it. 
      • Very diverse contributors in terms of political, religious, cultural backgrounds. 
      • Someone will notice the change very quickly, and then they'll just simply revert the change.
    • 18 percent of all the edits to the website are done by anonymous users. 
    • Very close-knit community of maybe 600 to 1,000 people who are in constant communication. 
    • The tools and the software: 
      • There's lots of tools that allow us -- allow us, meaning the community -- to self-monitor and to monitor all the work. 
      • You can see changes immediately 
      • We leave everything very open-ended. 
      • There's nothing in the software that enforces the rules. 
    • Rick Kay is a very famous Wikipedian who does an enormous amount of work with vandalism, hoaxesand votes for deletion. 
    • We try not to vote on the content of articles, because the majority view is not necessarily neutral. 
    • There's a certain amount of aristocracy. 
    • Jimmy Wales: "benevolent dictator" - "I don't think that it's my job or my role in the world of ideas to be the dictator of the future of all human knowledge compiled by the world."
    • A need still for a certain amount of monarchy
    • "That's my job in the community: to say we won't allow our opennessand freedom to undermine the quality of the content. And so as long as people trust me in my role, then that's a valid place for me."
    • "I can't tell anyone what to do."
    • So the final point here is that to understand how Wikipedia works, 
    • it's important to understand that our Wiki model is the way we work:
      • we're very flexible about the social methodology
      • it's ultimately the passion of the community is for the quality of the work
      • not necessarily for the process that we use to generate it.
    • A lot of teachers are beginning to use Wikipedia.
    • There's a media storyline about Wikipedia, which I think is false. 
    • It builds on the storyline of bloggers versus newspapers. 
    • And the storyline is, there's this crazy thing, Wikipedia
    • Academics hate it and teachers hate Wikipedia
    • But I think there's going to be huge impacts. And we actually have a project that I'm personally really excited about, which is the 
    • Wiki books project: an effort to create textbooks in all the languages. 
      • 20 years or so  
      • Our missiongiving an encyclopedia to every single person on the planet. 
      • A tool that they can use
      • Freely licensed textbooks are the next big thing in education.
"The Cloud Filmmaking Manifesto"

    • April 20, 2013
    • Director Tiffany Shlain 
    • Keynote address 
    • Tribeca Film Festival’s Interactive Day
    • Cloudsourcing Creativity and Giving Back in the Age of Collaboration
    • Tiffany Shlain 
      • Remixing and recontextualizing images
      • Filmmaker
      • Director
      • Filmmaking style of remixing came out of necessity 
      • Film theory student ant UC Berkeley in the early 1990's 
      • No film production facilities 
      • "The idea of recontextualizing images from different eras to express larger ideas about modern times was very exciting to me."
      • Archival aesthetic is the foundation of filmmaking style 
      • Connected: An Autoblogography about Love, Death, & Technology: comprised of a combination of archival images from many eras sewn together with new original animations
      • "My attempt to understand our world, where we came form, and where we're headed." 
      • The new tools and technologies that enable video sharing have allowed me and my team at The Moxie Institute to embark on "cloud filmmaking" 
    • Biggest line items: licensing footage and creating animation 
    • "It’s an ever growing moveable visual feast of delicacies from all over around the world."
    • Let it Ripple: Mobile Films for Global Change
      a short film series that leverages the creativity of individuals and organizations from across the globe. 
      • A Declaration of Interdependence (first film in this series)
        • rewrote the U.S. Declaration of Independence 
        • July 4, 2011
        • "We then asked people through social media either to video themselves reading the script, or to submit artwork that represented ideas in the script."
        • Videos and art submissions poured in from all over the world, 
          in all different languages. 
        • The experiment was not only working, it was bigger than we imagined.
        • "The participatory revolution" 
        • 4 minute global mash-up demonstrating the vast potential of creative collaboration in the 21st century
        • Example of "the participatory revolution”
        • “For centuries we’ve declared our independence. Perhaps it’s now time we declare our interdependence.” 
        • In responding to this last line of the film, we launched our foray into Cloud Filmmaking.
    • Cloud Filmmaking: 
      • Collaborating on the film as one. 
      • Working with footage that people shot and sent from all over the world
      • We were all invested in seeing the film happen and the final message
      • Different way to premiere it
      • We decided to do a simultaneous online and live premiere
      • Featured by YouTube 
      • "It felt like a space-time-cinema shift."
      • The film has now been volunteer-translated into 65 languages.
    • The next phase of Cloud Filmmakinggiving back. 
      • Free customized versions of the film for nonprofits and organizations all over the world. 
      • We work with them to craft a custom “call to action” then replace our “call to action” with theirs.
    • Now, we are taking Cloud Filmmaking to a mobile app. 
    • Connected App
      • iPhone, android and iPad 
      • Free
      • Add even more tools to the collective toolbox of participation for both Connected and the Let it Ripple series
      • Built-in recording so that you can participate by contributing to the next film, sharing your stories about using the films or about interdependence, or your ideas on the “participatory revolution.”
      • Regularly updated database of research and posts about “connectedness in the 21st century” 
      • Information on how to host a screening, 
      • Instructions on how to use interactive discussion tools where both the host and the audience can engage with the research, conversation cards, and discussion book before and after the film
      • You can also license our Educator’s Edition and receive both printed materials for the class and the mobile app to engage, participate, and give back. 
      • The app is yet another way of redefining the relationship between the creator and the receiver. 
      • Cloud Filmmaking is about everyone participating.
    • Second film in the Let it Ripple series: Brain Power: From Neurons to Networks
      • Based on exciting research from Harvard, University of Washington, and UCBerkeley on how to best nurture a young child’s brain. 
      • Based on this research, we looked at the parallels between nurturing the growth of the brain and nurturing the growth of the Internet 
    • Over the next four years we will make 20 of these short films, evolving the way we collaborate with people and organizations.
    • “The Age of Collaboration” : "People around the world are able to share strategies when catastrophe strikes; scientists are opening up problems to gamers to solve previously unsolvable problems, and artists and inventors can gather groups of supporters to help them fund their projects."
    • "My team at The Moxie Institute and I are cloudsourcing creativity to tell collaborative, universal stories that can be used by organizations all over the world."
    • The possibilities keep expanding for people to tell their stories. I love when Apple added a second camera to the front of the phone so people can now film themselves with ease, removing any mediation between people recording their ideas and stories.
    • We ultimately are a species of storytellers. 
    • This is how we share, empathize and learn. 
    • “The Internet and movie makers  have collided, and the result is a cloud film-making revolution.” – Dean Takahashi, Venture Beat

No comments:

Post a Comment